As our armies get larger, the point of the "neutral" armies becomes less and less. So two idea, please let me know which you prefer.
1) any time an army has a 3-1 points advantage, we just assume they win via massacre and move on.
2) We up the size of the neutral armies.
Thoughts?
I lean somewhat towards the first both to save time and since there has been less of people playing armies they do not normally play than I hoped for...but i am up for the latter, too, as I am really enjoying the alternative scenarios.
Feedback much appreciated.
Space Wolves (Heresy)
-
5 Terminators w.Storm Bolter, Power Fist 4 Terminators w. heavy weapons 5
Terminators w.Storm Shield and Thunder Hammer 1 Dreadnought 2 Chapter
Masters 1 L...
4 years ago
2 comments:
I would prefer upping the size of neutral armies. But undoubtably in both campaigns (more so the large one), size of warbanners can easily get excessive. A cap on how many points a banner can hold may be a good idea (not that I don't want to have 10,000 point warbanners)
Maybe designated warhosts that can handle a larger cap?
Good fill someone in on and this post helped me alot in my college assignement. Say thank you you seeking your information.
Post a Comment