As our armies get larger, the point of the "neutral" armies becomes less and less. So two idea, please let me know which you prefer.
1) any time an army has a 3-1 points advantage, we just assume they win via massacre and move on.
2) We up the size of the neutral armies.
I lean somewhat towards the first both to save time and since there has been less of people playing armies they do not normally play than I hoped for...but i am up for the latter, too, as I am really enjoying the alternative scenarios.
Feedback much appreciated.
Harlequin 1500pt Tournament List - Have a one-day 40k event next weekend which is using some of special scenarios from the back of the rule e.g. City Scapes etc. Had to decide between Death...
4 weeks ago